By Douglas V. Gibbs
We, and by “we” I mean the conservative Trump-supporting side of politics, knew from day one that the Russia-Russia-Russia claim in 2016 that Donald J. Trump was somehow in collusion with the Russians or that Trump won the presidency for his first term because of Russian hacking, influence and meddling was false. On my radio programs I told my audiences that the Democrats had gotten to the point where they believed their own B.S., which was predicated on the idea that Hillary Clinton was the inevitable heir for Obama, and that because of the Obama presidency the GOP would never win the presidency again…ever. The polls, of which they were manipulating, said so. So, when Donald J. Trump won in 2016 it seemed in the minds of the deep state establishment and their Democratic Party allies to be absolutely impossible that it had happened fairly – or, at least that’s what they needed to convince the voting public of so that it never happened again.
Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and a whole list of players who have their hands on the levers of the Democratic Party, went into action. If Trump’s win was an impossibility, yet it happened, then it must’ve been rigged – which shocked the Democrats because a part of the reason that they knew that they would win was because they were rigging the system for perpetual wins. So, they couldn’t say that Trump rigged the election directly, or that the voting machines were involved in any way because then people would want to investigate domestically any election inconsistencies and that would create a discovery of their electoral shenanigans. So, the threat needed to be external.
It must’ve been Russia.
The problem was, already having a Russian influence excuse cooking up as a back-up plan, the intelligence community had already provided a report explaining that Russia had no interest in election interference, and were not capable of it. Besides, considering the Democratic Party’s left-leaning tendencies, it would be a big pill to swallow to convince folks that Putin wanted Trump to win. If he wanted an ally in the White House, that person would be Hillary Clinton. The Clinton’s already had a history of cozying up to communists, selling them American technology, and selling them uranium – not to mention the left-leaning tendencies of Democratic politicians of which Republicans typically were repulsed by. The Democratic Party’s purposeful weakness when it came to geopolitical affairs was what Putin needed to carry out his global agenda of increased Russian influence and seeking to return to the glory days of the Soviet Union which at the time may even mean an invasion of former Soviet republics…like Ukraine. So, the Democrats altered their story once that all surfaced, and settled on saying, “Well, he just wanted chaos. Putin just wants to create disruption.”
Again, an argument to deflect any eyes away from their own deceptive meanderings that were already in the making.
The problem was, they had no proof, and the intelligence community disagreed with the preferred narrative and assessment. So, Obama went to Brennan and Comey (CIA and FBI) to get them to change the intelligence community’s findings while the media stepped in to make sure that everyone just knew that the Russians were the problem, and that Trump’s win was a lie. Then, to help solidify the whole thing, Hamilton 68 was launched to also prove to everyone that hard evidence was found revealing that the Russians were scouring the internet with their bots and technology wizardry to put out a false narrative on Trump to falsely convince voters to not vote for the billionaire businessman who was a threat to the political establishment machine. Then, the infamous Steele dossier emerged into view – a collection of unverified claims funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee – which was dismissed internally as “internet rumor” but still influenced the whole scheme.
It was obvious that the Democrats were lying, and had cooked up the whole scheme. However, like a Scooby Doo cartoon, we still needed proof of the whole deception, and the meddling kids from the GOP didn’t have any access to prove anything. I was beginning to wonder if the Democrats were going to get away with their Russia-gate hoax.
In 2020, the Democrats made sure they weren’t caught flat-footed again. They threw fifteen million more votes in Biden’s direction through their own election fraud schemes, and it was enough to bring the election win back into the laps of the Democrats. And Biden, the sweet old man in the eyes of the public from the Democrats’ point of view would be acceptable, adored, and easy to manipulate.
The Republicans, or at least Trump-supporting folks out there who were paying close attention, realized that the 2020 Election had been stolen. So, they began doing their own investigations, and began talking about it. The Democrats needed to do something fast, so when Trump-leaning Republicans went to Washington D.C. on January 6, 2021 to air their grievances, a new plan was cooked up – one that should end the Trump-supporting MAGA scourge forever by creating a production to show the rest of the country that Trump-supporters were angry, dangerous and violent insurrectionists willing to violently attack The Capitol to try to overturn the election. Then, the Democrats put everything they could into it, arresting over 1,500 people in connection with the alleged January 6 Insurrection. Despite evidence that the whole thing was not an insurrection, that there was agitation perpetrated by the Democrats’ allies in the Capitol Police ranks, and that FBI assets were on the ground manipulating the scene (and that Antifa was being brought in by the bus loads) the January 6 Committee put out damaging findings against Trump and his MAGA supporters, and then the Democrats kicked into high-gear a lawfare blitz aimed at making sure Trump was branded a criminal just like his January 6 supporters. The narrative was simple. Trump was a criminal, his supporters were insurrectionists, and the whole GOP membership was filled with a bunch of anti-democracy, racist, white supremacist, fascist domestic terrorists who must be kept out of political power forever.
Meanwhile, Biden’s mental acuity was on the decline. Now the Democrats had something new to deal with. No problem – it was nothing they couldn’t handle with a lot of secrecy, keeping Biden off the air as much as possible, and the autopen.
Fast Forward to 2024. Election Integrity was in place thanks to many patriots around the country with memories of the horrors of the 2020 election steal clearly pulsing in their minds. Americans were fed up with the Democrats and their “Hate Trump” fervor along with the failure of Progressive policies during the Biden administration. Then, during the election cycle Biden’s lack of mental acuity became apparent no matter how hard they tried to hide it (the final straw being during the debate against Trump), and then when they forced Kamala Harris into the race, despite them using the media to prop her up and cook the polls, Trump won the 2024 Election – and while slim, the Republicans kept a majority in the House of Representatives and one in the Senate when you factored in the Vice President’s duty as President of the Senate to break any ties in any of the votes.
Disaster!
The Democrats were on the ropes again. How could this possibly happen?
No problem. They would do what history reveals they’ve done many times before: retreat to the stronghold of the courts where it would be more difficult to dislodge them, and fight against them.
Lawfare refocused from the lawfare of the previous four years against Trump-the-civilian to using the federal inferior courts against Trump-the-President – where activist judges would be used to unconstitutionally strike down everything that Trump tried to accomplish.
Unfortunately for the Democrats, the Court of Public Opinion sees what they are doing and it is garnering even more support for President Trump. His popularity is rising no matter what they try to throw at him. The “Hate Trump” agenda is backfiring, and the Democratic Party looks like a party coming apart at the seams. All of their dirty games have not been working, and now people like Kash Patel, Dan Bongino and Pam Bondi are looking under the skirt of Democratic Politics over the last eight-plus years. Sure, the Democrats have done their share of destroying documents, and doctoring documents, but it hasn’t been enough. Somewhere, they missed a few dotting and crossing of certain letters and the truth is finally beginning to bubble to the surface.
Which brings us to Tulsi Gabbard.
The former Democrat, and now the Trump #47 United States Director of National Intelligence, has put out there that a recently declassified report from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has shed light on the origins of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), which claimed that Russian President Vladimir Putin favored Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. However, the report reveals some interesting findings. Then CIA Director John Brennan pushed for the inclusion of potentially unreliable and biased reports to support the narrative, despite previous intelligence reports showing a lack of solid evidence.
Why would Brennan do such a thing?
Then, the big reveal: Because President Barack Obama gave the order to release that false information.
According to the document:
Acting on President Obama’s orders, DCIA Brennan directed a “full review” and publication of raw HUMINT information that had been collected before the election. CIA officers said that some of this information had been held on orders of the DCIA, while other reporting had been judged by experienced CIA officers to have not met longstanding publication standards. Some of the latter was unclear or from unknown subsources, but would nonetheless be published after the election – on orders of DCIA and cited in the ICA to support claims that Putin aspired to help Trump win.
The damning 2020 report was scoured out of existence by the Democrats, except that Representative Devin Nunes (R-CA), a Trump ally, saved it, and stored it in a secure vault at CIA headquarters.
The whole assessment and Russia Hoax plan was put into place by a small team of five CIA analysts right before Trump’s 2017 Inauguration, overlooking sourcing and analysis because of the haste it was put into action.
The plan went into full-force, cherry-picking intelligence, ignoring or downplaying any information that contradicted the narrative, and claiming that reliable sources indicated that Russian officials anticipated a Clinton win and were determined to create chaos in the election.
Real intelligence, however, did not fit the narrative. Putin believed he would be able to negotiate more effectively with a Hillary Clinton administration because the Democrat was a weaker leader who could be more easily influenced.
The narrative, however, needed voters to believe that Trump was the person Putin preferred – that Russia believed they would get their way more with Trump, rather than Hillary. But if that was so, then why wasn’t Russia during their alleged meddling releasing damaging material on Clinton as the race tightened, despite having opportunities to do so?
The report being revealed by Tulsi Gabbard reveals that two high-ranking CIA officers reportedly advised CIA chief Brennan that no concrete evidence existed to support claims of Putin’s Pro-Trump bias.
The declassification and big reveal by Tulsi Gabbard not only confirms what we already had suspected, but also points a great big finger at President Obama. Former CIA Chief John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey then lied to Congress about the whole thing way back when. Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, along with his CIA and FBI buddies, tossed aside any evidence that did not fit their narrative, and then rushed out a doctored “intelligence assessment” that falsely claimed the opposite. The manipulated evidence was designed to stop the Trump presidency, and at least get Trump prosecuted.
Understand, this is not just a hunch or a little bit of information. What Tulsi Gabbard has put out there is overwhelming evidence showing that President Barack Obama and his national security team “manufactured and politicized intelligence” in the aftermath of President Donald Trump’s 2016 victory. The Democrats weaponized federal agencies against a duly elected President. Many years ago we knew that the Russia collusion narrative was false, but extensive investigations were never able to produce the hard evidence needed to prove it. This new information surfacing reveals not only that it happened, but the political motivation in place as the Democrats pursued the Trump Campaign with sweeping, fabricated allegations of ties between Trump and Russia.
According to Gabbard: “The years-long Mueller investigation, two Congressional impeachments, high-level officials being investigated, arrested, and thrown in jail, heightened US-Russia tensions, and more — all of these were the direct result of this manufactured narrative.”
The whole thing reveals corruption at the highest levels. The whole thing was not designed to protect national security as advertised, but to dismantle the legitimacy of an election that shook the leftist corrupt establishment to the core.
Gabbard said regarding the conspiracy: “Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people.”
This “coup,” as Gabbard described it, involved the misuse of intelligence, the weaponization of law enforcement agencies, and a sustained campaign to delegitimize a sitting president.
She said, “President Obama, former Director of the CIA John Brennan, and others fabricated the Russia Hoax, suppressed intelligence showing Putin was preparing for a Clinton victory, manufactured findings from shoddy sources, disobeyed IC standards, and knowingly lied to the American people.”
That means that President Barack Obama and the U.S. leaders directing intelligence agencies at the time lied about the whole Russian-Collusion thing. President Richard Nixon resigned, and was under threat of impeachment, for lying to the American People. President Bill Clinton was impeached for lying to the American People about services rendered in the Oval Office by Monica Lewinsky. Lying to the American Public is a big deal. This is not the kind of thing that should go quietly into the dark as the Golden Age finally gets its chance to unveil itself.
And Obama didn’t just lie. His administration used U.S. intelligence to back false claims about Trump and Russia, doing what they could to try and sabotage a peaceful transition of power. Didn’t the Democrats claim that trying to “overturn” an election or messing with an election is “insurrection” while they were deceptively barking about January 6, 2021?
They wasted millions of taxpayer dollars and damaged U.S. foreign policy to try to deny the American voting public their choice for President, and then by hitting Trump with fabricated scandals, including a massive special council investigation.
The Democrats lied to Americans about Russian interference and smeared Trump as a treasonous colluder with Russia.
Is not those actions, based on the very definition given to us by the Democrats over January 6, treasonous actions by Barack Obama and everyone else involved?
Obama lied to Americans in speeches about Russian election interference, well knowing that U.S. intelligence before he ordered them to change their assessment had assessed his statements to be false. Then, they erected a totalitarian censorship edifice under the pretext of “misinformation” and “disinformation” to cap the deception. They blatantly leaked false intelligence to the Washington Post, they falsely claimed that Russia used “cyber means” to influence “the outcome of the election.” The narrative spread throughout the willing corporate media web like a virus, infecting the news cycles with the false information, and filling the heads of Americans with doctored information and false claims in the hopes of hamstringing the first Trump presidency. An echo chamber was created in the mainstream media selling that Trump was a treasonous colluder with Russia, and that Obama’s payout of American tax dollars to Iran and the government takeover of formerly private health markets with Obamacare were good things. The fact is, Obama got the ball rolling, and according to Tulsi Gabbard’s document release Obama was likely directly involved with his administration’s spying on the Trump campaign (a practice Biden’s administration also took advantage of in 2024), the Obama administration spied on domestic political opponents, an email from Susan Rice implicated Obama in the Russian collusion smear against Trump, Obama intelligence officials likely lied to Congress, and that Obama himself was involved in ensnaring Trump’s first national security advisor in yet another fabricated scandal using spying, leaking, and manipulation of U.S. intelligence.
Meanwhile, as all of these ground-breaking, earth-shattering revelations emerge with Tulsi Gabbard’s releases the mainstream corporate media has been silent about it all. Gabbard is accusing Barack Obama and the top knuckleheads of the Democratic Party deep state swamp of orchestrating a “years-long coup” and manufacturing and politicizing intelligence so that they could set the stage for the Trump-Russia collusion narrative against President Donald Trump following his 2016 election win with overwhelming evidence and the media has largely ignored or downplayed Gabbard’s explosive claims. ABC and NBC have failed to cover the story at all.
Don’t forget that these same news outlets were screaming in support to help promote the anti-Trump Russia hoax when the thing was first being perpetrated against the American people.
The Democratic Party political class is also trying to deflect from the revelations, suggesting that the timing of Gabbard’s releases are designed to distract away from the Jeffrey Epstein case, another basket full of lies that the MAGA movement is refusing to take the bait regarding.
Former CIA Director John Brennan has been slamming Gabbard’s findings as “misrepresentations,” and “ludicrous.”
The information Gabbard has, meanwhile, has been given to the Department of Justice, adding to the building of a major criminal conspiracy case targeting the Deep State’s decade-long effort to derail Donald Trump. This all goes way beyond Crossfire Hurricane, extending all the way back to 2016 and extending all the way forward to 2024 encompassing a large series of events by the Democrats aimed at stopping Trump from winning the presidency.
According to investigative journalist John Solomon on Steve Bannon’s Real America’s Voice, Pam Bondi doesn’t have to seek a grand jury or the indictment in Washington D.C., either, where the jury pool is coming from a 90% Democrat environment. Because of the Mar-a-Lago raid, the case could be brought in Florida, where “several overt acts of the conspiracy occurred.”
Solomon also explained that the conspiracy spanned multiple events, including the Trump-Russia hoax, the Ukraine impeachment, and even the FBI’s refusal to act on intelligence regarding Chinese interference in the 2020 election. “They didn’t want to help Donald Trump, so they ignored a potential counterintelligence threat,” he said. “It allows for a very large series of events to be wrapped into a single conspiracy.”
When asked whether this approach could overcome the statute of limitations for certain crimes, Solomon explained how conspiracy charges work. “You can charge a series of events into a larger conspiracy and go back beyond the window of time that the normal statute of limitations for any single crime occurred,” he said. He also noted that prosecutors could argue the statute was tolled if crimes were hidden from the public.
Bannon summed it up as a potential game-changer: “That means… we can go back in time 10 years and still get Brennan and still get all these guys for more serious charges of conspiracy to — of a coup d’état?”
“That’s how conspiracy cases can work,” Solomon replied.
Perhaps Barack Obama himself is not as clean and as untouchable as originally advertised by the rabid Democratic Establishment. Despite the Democrats portraying Obama as the gold standard of presidential perfection, the façade is falling apart real fast. The former president is now at the center of the entire Russia hoax, with evidence to back it up. Could Obama’s framing of Trump as some would-be “Russian asset” lead to something bigger that may even allow the former president to be prosecuted for his part in, do I dare say it, insurrection? No matter what happens, after all of the dust settles I am figuring that Barack Obama will lose more than merely his legacy-building image.
We must remember, before we get so excited that we begin investing in orange jump suit producing companies, investigations like this takes time. Matt Taibbi, an award-winning journalist, indicates that we also need to realize that there are layers of protection around someone like Obama. The evidence is there, and he could be in serious hot water, but cases need to be built and challenges appear at every turn. And don’t forget, “if you read between the lines of the documents, some of these folks were in CYA mode even back then.”
Either Obama falls, someone else does, or perhaps a whole bunch of them do. That fact is, according to Gabbard’s releases, Obama knew, Obama ordered it, and Obama owns one of the biggest scandals in U.S. political history. Will all involved, including Obama, be “investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law?”
If false intelligence really was manufactured at “the President’s request,” then Barack Obama is in really big trouble. He engaged in a “treasonous conspiracy,” and Gabbard is calling for “every person involved in this conspiracy” to be prosecuted. Gabbard told Maria Bartiromo that whistleblowers are starting to “come out of the woodwork.” President Donald Trump posted an AI video that depicts Barack Obama being arrested.
The Supreme Court ruling regarding presidential immunity, according to the Democrats, shields Obama from prosecution – but if you read the ruling it is about the President performing his presidential duties – something that straight out treason would not be protected by.
Meanwhile, Senate Republicans are re-opening the Clinton email probe. Several thumb drives were never analyzed, and the DOJ’s prior investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server also served as a piece of the overall conspiracy against Trump. The information related to Hillary Clinton’s emails constitute material evidence in Obama’s broader criminal conspiracy, and contain information relevant to the conspiracy investigation. In the batch of information is also some of Obama’s emails, and purported communications with Democratic National Convention people like then Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and two different individuals who worked for the Soros Open Society Foundations. The intelligence reports allege that the Obama administration took efforts to scuttle the investigation into Clinton to protect her candidacy. Weeks after Comey exonerated Clinton in a public statement (July 5, 2016), on July 31, 2016 Comey’s FBI formally opened the bogus Crossfire Hurricane investigation into President Trump’s disproven collusion with Russia.
Sources:
https://canadafreepress.com/article/hamilton-68-fraud-regarding-russian-bots#google_vignette
https://www.axios.com/2024/11/06/trump-popular-vote-republican-candidates
https://thelibertydaily.com/declassified-report-reveals-obama-gave-order-release-fake/
https://protrumpnews.com/tulsi-gabbard-releases-more-russiagate-docs/
https://slaynews.com/news/corporate-media-blackout-tulsi-gabbards-bombshell-criminal-referral-obama/
https://thelibertydaily.com/trump-admin-cooking-major-criminal-conspiracy-case-against/
Obama is hiding behind the fact that Marco Rubio said, in an investigation, that there was no Russian collusion, correct? Well, Rubio ONLY had access to the records that they ‘wanted’ him to see. It would be interesting to see what he says about what additional information that Tulsi has uncovered. Democrats act like a President can’t be arrested, but they arrested Trump, so Presidential immunity probably isn’t covered for treason. The whole rotten crew needs to face justice. We’re 6 months into this and we’ve see a handful of illegals being arrested, but NO high profile people at all has faced accountability. Several blue state governors and mayors have obstructed justice by creating sanctuary cities, why aren’t they charged?