By Douglas V. Gibbs
In 1787, the Founding Fathers debated judicial power with intensity and foresight. The conscept of judicial review was discussed, and rejected. They envisioned judges to be impartial arbiters who only applied the law to the cases they heard, not for them to act as political operatives. Lady Justice wears a blindfold for a reason: justice must be blind. Ideology was never meant to tip the scales. The courtroom was to be a sanctuary for law and reason, not a playground for partisan ambition.
Yet today, the judicial branch has been weaponized. The Left treats the court system like a political grocery store, shopping for favorable jurisdictions, cherry-picking activist judges, and filing lawsuits not to uphold the law, but to undermine it. Of the roughly 400 cases filed against the Trump administration, a significant number landed in districts dominated by judges appointed by Democratic presidents. Nearly 70% of federal judges lean leftward, and many are unashamed to rule from ideology rather than the Constitution.
Thankfully, the Supreme Court has resisted this trend. That resistance infuriates the Democrats. James Carville has openly predicted that if his party regains full control after the 2028 election, they’ll pack the Court, transforming it into a rubber stamp for their agenda. Their goal isn’t justice. It’s domination.
Instead of marching down the Democrats’ yellow brick road to a canyon of cultural decay, the Supreme Court has become a bulwark against rogue rulings from lower courts; rulings that attempt to micromanage the President’s constitutionally granted executive power. And the legal battles are just beginning.
The docket is swelling with cases that will shape the 2026 midterms and beyond. The legal avalanche is growing faster than the exodus from New York City, where radical figures like Zohran Mamdani threaten to turn policy into ideological warfare. The courts are now the battleground for everything from election integrity to executive authority.
The media loves to spotlight the culture war cases. When the public rejects WOKE extremism, the Left turns to the courts, hoping a sympathetic judge will turn fringe ideology into binding precedent. These aren’t mere legal disagreements. They’re ideological assaults on American values. The strategy is simple: shop for a judge, win a ruling, and silence dissent.
This term is a blockbuster, one that will determine whether we move toward constitutional restoration or plunge deeper into judicial tyranny. New cases are added weekly. The fight for America’s soul has shifted from the ballot box to the bench.
But here’s the irony: Judicial Review, as practiced today, was never authorized by the Constitution. The courts were never meant to be the final gatekeepers of our future. Yet now, only through the courts can we hope to reverse the damage.
The stakes couldn’t be higher. The Constitution hangs in the balance. And the courtroom, once a place of blind justice, has become the front line in a war for liberty.
— Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
