Political Pistachio
By Douglas V. Gibbs
Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution states that no State shall “enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State.” Yet, “seventeen States and the District of Columbia have joined the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, agreeing to allocate their electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate wins the national popular vote – regardless of which candidate wins a majority of the state’s vote.” (Daily Signal)
Also known as the National Popular Vote Bill, had it been in effect in 2024, Donald Trump would have carried New York, California, the New England states, and a flurry of other “Blue States,” giving him 520 votes in the Electoral College which would have given Trump almost enough electors to win the most Electoral Votes in the history of presidential elections. 520, if achieved, would have been five short of Reagan’s 1984 win, and tie Nixon’s 1972 win. The attempt to assassinate the Electoral College is designed to ensure that regardless of what the Electoral College decides, the President with the most popular votes wins. The purveyors of a National Popular Vote claim that the Electoral College is a danger to democracy, even though only five times in history has the winner of a presidential election lost the popular vote – three times in the nineteenth century, and twice since the launch of the new millennium: 2000 (Gore v. Bush) and 2016 (Clinton v. Trump). In their arrogance, I am supposing, they were convinced that no Republican could ever win the popular vote again after Obama’s sweeping popular vote wins, Clinton’s loss despite earning a popular vote win, and Biden’s massive 81.2 million popular vote win. Granted, some people are wondering where the 10 million votes above the rising normal average that Biden got in 2020 went, with Harris only receiving 71,708,435 votes; Trump got 75.5 million. Newsweek released an article titled “Where Did the Millions of Joe Biden Votes Go?” a couple days after the election, before all of the votes had been tallied.
Where did those votes vanish to, indeed?
I have my thoughts, and a Trump Administration’s move to tighten election integrity may discover what we already know to be the truth in the coming months or years.
The National Popular Vote movement is fueled and largely funded by organizations hoping to push America more towards democracy, and away from its roots as a federal republic. The largest donor to the push to kill the Electoral College is the left-leaning Democracy Fund Voice, who contributed $400,000 in 2022. The Soros’s have also pumped money into the compact. The current membership of the compact possesses 209 electoral votes, but it doesn’t go into effect until the number of membership States increases to the point of possessing a minimum of 270 electoral votes, which is the total needed to reach a majority of electoral votes and elect a President. In 2024, if the agreement had been in operation it would have provided Donald Trump with more than two hundred additional electoral votes.
I am guessing that if something like that had happened, the Democrats would have suddenly discovered that the whole thing was unconstitutional and someone would sue. Trent England, the Executive Director of Save our States, which is an organization working to protect the Electoral College against the threat of the National Popular Vote, when asked about such a scenario stated, “one state court decision could unravel the entire compact.”
The Daily Signal reported, regarding the issue, that the National Popular Vote organization claims it is a myth that the national popular vote to elect a president would give an advantage to Democrats over Republicans. Donald Trump in 2024 proved that statement to be true in this new era of patriotic awakening, and I am guessing after Trump turns America around, J.D. Vance will likely enjoy back-to-back terms as President winning the popular vote both times, in addition to the number of electoral votes. During the next decade I am figuring the National Popular Vote agenda will die on the vine.
I have railed against the National Popular Vote over the years recognizing that the Electoral College protects us from the excesses of democracy. The Electoral College represents an important mechanism that was put in place to preserve the Republic by disallowing the population centers from over-dominating any election. The mechanisms of the republic serve (and served) as a check and balance against the populated areas dominating as a ruling faction. A National Popular Vote, if put in place as the sole mechanism to elect the President, could potentially make it so that the half-dozen largest cities in America would choose the President, and everyone else’s votes would not matter. In Federalist Paper #10, Madison explained that the best way to control the factions, and disallow any of them from dominating, was to set them against each other which could be accomplished by giving the minority voice a greater voice – something that the Electoral College accomplishes making even less-populated States vitally important in the counting of the electoral votes.
The Heritage Foundation in its ebook, The Essential Electoral College, explains, “The Electoral College prevents presidential candidates from winning an election by focusing solely on high-population urban centers and dense media markets, forcing them to seek the support of a larger cross-section of the American electorate. This addresses the Founders’ fears of a ‘tyranny of the majority,’ which has the potential to marginalize sizable portions of the population, particularly in rural and more remote areas of the country.”
It turns out Trump has spoiled the beliefs of the Democratic Party in more ways than most people have realized with his 2024 win. As more Americans become aware of the insane plans the Democrats have for America morally, politically, and economically, the drive to finish the left’s push for democracy will likely sputter, spin out of control, and find itself abandoned in some historical ditch along the side of the road of history.
— Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
By Douglas V. Gibbs
Gavin Newsom, the Democrat Governor of the lost State of California, gathered together his super-majority Democratic Party controlled State Legislature to discuss with them how to “Trump-Proof” the once Golden State from the Trump Administration that will take control of the Executive Branch on January 20, 2025. On X he posted, “Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action – we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked.”
In a statement, Newsom said that the plan was to “protect civil rights, reproductive freedom, climate action, and immigrant families…On immigrant protection, California has advanced policies that support immigrant families and is investing in their protection.”
President-Elect Donald Trump responded on Truth Social stating that “Newscum is trying to KILL our Nation’s beautiful California…more people are leaving than are coming in…he is using the term Trump-Proof as a way of stopping all of the GREAT things that can be done to Make California Great Again.”
Newsom in not alone. A number of Democrat Party governors and local officials have stated they plan to fight back against Trump’s policies, with all of them listing Trump’s immigration agenda as a part of what they plan to fight back against.
Among Trump’s promises that have angered the leftist leaders is the plan to withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities and states. Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey told MSNBC that Massachusetts would “absolutely not” help Trump with his deportation plans.
Massachusetts, California and Illinois currently operate under laws making them “sanctuary states,” which forbids local law enforcement from communicating with, nor cooperating with, federal immigration enforcement agencies. Sanctuary laws violate Article VI. of the U.S. Constitution, which disallows States from passing laws that are contrary to federal law regarding issues expressly authorized to the federal government by the United States Constitution. Immigration is provided as a federal authority by Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution, border security is authorized to the federal government in Article IV., Section 4, and naturalization is provided as a federal authority in Article I, Section 8.
Trump has announced that immigration enforcement will be strict during his administration, calling for “mass deportations,” and appointing former ICE acting director Tom Homan as border czar.
Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker has also said that Illinois will not comply with Trump policies, stating in a press conference, “You come for my people, you come through me.”
Local officials plan to also stand in the way of Trump’s immigration agenda. Los Angeles plans to pass a sanctuary city ordinance, which will include prohibiting federal immigration personnel from accessing L.A.’s databases.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) plans to take legal actions against Trump’s upcoming administration. This is the same organization who filed over 400 legal actions against Trump during his first term.
— Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
By Douglas V. Gibbs
Welcome Home. Never Forget. Thank you for your service.
The average person does not understand the commitment our service members make when they take the oath to protect and defend the United States Constitution, and the United States of America. I don’t know about today’s generation, but my generation took it very seriously. While in the service of the United States Navy I worked harder than I ever have since, and got the least amount of sleep per night than I have ever experienced. I was young. I went into the U.S. Navy at eighteen, and worked my way up to Petty Officer Third Class (E-4) before being discharged just a few months before my EAOS (End of Active Obligated Service) with service-connected injuries. I earned two Battle Efficiency (Battle E) ribbons. On my first ship, even though I was a personnelman, because the ship’s office was full of personnel, I was a low-ranking recruit so l performed duties on the mess decks and “four-hours-on-and-fours-fours-off” underway watches with the deck apes.
I Look back in amazement over how many duties I had to carry out in addition to even that. The military pushes an individual to limits he never thought he could achieve. It was very hard, to say the least. But, as a member of your unit, you don’t even hesitate when it comes to accomplishing those tasks. I just did it, because it was the right thing to do, and because that’s a part of what you signed up for.
I was injured while serving on my first command, and I was told I would never go back to full duty, walk normally again, or be able to mentally comprehend the rigors of my duties due to the traumatic brain injury I had incurred. After for months of rigorous physical therapy I went back to full duty, this time aboard the USS Peoria, LST-1183, seemingly fully recovered and ready to roll. After a year or so, one of my injuries began to haunt me again, and then I was placed on limited duty status, again, but this time as a path to an administrative medical discharge.
Yesterday my wife and I visited the Museum of military vehicles in Dubois, Wyoming and at that amazing location we saw incredible depictions of what our War veterans experienced throughout the history of this exceptional country.
My wife and I cried while experiencing some of the dioramas. She asked me about the term, “Veteran.”
A veteran, I explained, is anyone who took the oath to serve, and spent any amount of time on active duty. There are different kinds of veterans. We have Veterans of Foreign Wars, we have peacetime veterans, and veterans who fill all kinds of slots in between. While, in my case, we had a few entanglements with the Soviet Union, and in the Persian Gulf, because there was no official military operation going on, I am officially a peacetime veteran. I served during the mid-eighties, falling short of my four years by just a few months. I also explained to my wife that the percentage of those who serve is very low. According to the Veteran’s Affairs Office, only 7.3 percent of all living Americans have served in the military at some point in their lives. That’s approximately one in every thirteen people.
Today is Veteran’s Day. . . an opportunity for us to thank those few who were willing to take that oath.
The birth of Veteran’s Day goes back to the end of World War I in 1918. The Allied powers signed a cease-fire agreement with Germany at Rethondes, France on Nov. 11, 1918, bringing World War I to a close.
Between the two world wars, Nov. 11 was commemorated as Armistice Day in the United States, Great Britain, and France. After World War II ended, the holiday was recognized as a day of tribute to the veterans of both world wars.
Beginning in 1954, the United States designated Nov. 11 as Veterans Day to honor veterans of all U.S. wars.
Veterans have a special understanding of sacrifice, challenges, and gaining opportunity out of situations that seem otherwise to be a dire circumstance.
During my term of military service, and after, I have seen my share of hardships, and difficulties. While I was in the military my injuries should have made me dead, but thanks to some very hard working medical personnel, I was given the opportunity to live again. As I stated, I worked my way back to full duty, and served on a second sea-going command. I, then, worked even harder to reestablish myself, to restore my dignity, and prove to everyone that I was fine. My evaluations rose to 4.0. On the USS Peoria I won the May 1987 Sailor of the Month Award, and later was runner-up for the Command Advancement Program. I not only worked in my rate, but also on the fire team, the security team, flight operations, amphibious operations, and I moved from Damage Control to The Bridge during General Quarters.
Now, so many years later, no matter how much I try to make it look like those injuries from when I was in the service do not affect me, they do. I try not to grumble. I try to remember that these are simply the storms of life. Each of my scars have a story. I earned them. But I am also a believer that it’s not right to beat one’s chest. People who accomplish should not spend their lives pointing at themselves for what they’ve done. Without God, none of it would have been possible. I believe most veterans are the same as I in the way they think about their time in military service. In my eyes they are heroes, but they will shrug and simply say, “I was just doing my job.”
Our service taught us that life is full of storms, and through them we learn, we strengthen, and sometimes opportunity arises out of these difficult storms. In all things there is potential for opportunity.
As a patient in the Veteran’s Administration system, the VA has been little influence in my life. After Reagan, they dealt with me as little as they had to. What has been amazing to me is that suddenly, during the presidency of Donald J. Trump, dealing with VA became a pleasure. It used to be that I had to go through three administrators to get to a doctor. It used to be that unless what was ailing me had a direct connection to my injuries, they were not interested in seeing me. The VA, under the Trump as President of the United States, became more in tune with the needs of our veterans, and they were even bending over backwards to make sure we receive the care we need. Under the Biden administration service declined again at the Veterans Administration, but now that Trump is returning to office I am looking forward to it improving again.
Among my military brethren we have a brotherhood the civilians don’t understand. It is in a sense, a fraternity of veteran brothers. We all took the same oath. We were, and are, committed to this country, and the service we were voluntarily willing to partake in. We have unwavering loyalty to our country that was founded on the firm foundation of divine Providence. While in the military, thanks to that service, as a young man I learned to understand the true meaning of honor, and what it was like to have an entire command of brothers. The training was fierce, and the hours would never have been acceptable in the world outside the military. It was grueling. It took everything I had to accomplish what I did.
It was more than I expected when I originally took that oath, and I was more than happy to partake in the rigorous duties.
As members of the American military we fought for every American’s freedom, and in the latest years, I have been very happy to see Americans become a very loud voice for America. A voice for liberty. A voice for freedom. In short, it’s nice to be thanked, and know that the folks thanking me truly mean it.
— Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
By Douglas V. Gibbs
During the recent presidential election the Democratic Party tried to make a large part of the campaign about the issue of abortion. They put out the entire spread of arguments they use, and then some, promising that they would preserve the “right to an abortion,” and that Donald J. Trump, if elected President, would seek a national ban on the practice.
Trump has taken a very constitutional stance on the issue, arguing that it is up to the States. That is, after all, what the 2021 ruling on Dobbs v. Jackson concluded, after all.
The abortion debate has been a constant one as long as I remember, and recently a friend of mine asked for help regarding a debate she was having with a friend who did not see abortion in the same way she did. Her opponent argued that abortion is about privacy, not abortion. Her friend also threw in the usual arguments like that it puts pregnant mothers at risk if the fetus cannot survive, and leaving the issue to the States will leave women who want abortions who live in anti-abortion States in a dangerous position and needing to be flown to other States to “receive the care they need.” Therefore, “there must be some sort of national law codifying the right to have an abortion.”
Abortion is not a new issue. The Founding Fathers discussed abortion, recognizing it to be against the rule of law. James Wilson, Signer of the U.S. Constitution, and defender of the Constitution at the Pennsylvania Ratification Convention, wrote: “With consistency, beautiful and undeviating, human life from its commencement to its close, is protected by the common law. In the contemplation of law, life begins when the infant is first able to stir in the womb. By the law, life is protected not only from immediate destruction, but from every degree of actual violence, and, in some cases, from every degree of danger.”
In ancient Rome, after the republic became an empire, and as internal decay was leading the once great society towards its ruin, morality had become an afterthought. Wrong became right, and right became wrong. Abortion became legal up to the age of two years of age. A couple, if they decided they did not want their baby for any reason, could legally leave a child under two years of age in the window or on the side of the road to die from the elements. Underground Christians were fined, and often jailed, for stealing the babies away in an effort to save their lives.
When my friend asked me about the abortion issue, and what might be a few ways to defend her position, I immediately responded that arguing abortion is more complex than people realize, and any stance against abortion cannot be argued through a series of basic sound-bytes. The problem is those who support abortion, and those who stand against it, don’t speak the same language; not only literally through their tongue, but the two sides don’t even follow the same premises regarding the issue in their hearts and souls. One side believes that a baby is a person, while the other claims fails to recognize the personhood of unborn babies. If an unborn baby is indeed a person, then their death by the hands of a doctor or anyone else is murder, and violates that person’s right to life as per the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. One side believes our rights are God-given which would mean abortion couldn’t possibly by a natural right, while the other believes abortion is a fundamental reproductive right and that it must be guaranteed and protected at any cost by government. One side believe that abortion is none of the federal government’s business and that the issue must be left up to the States to decide, while the other side believes it is not only a federal issue but that by leaving it to the States women will die. Then, along with all of that, there are varying degrees of beliefs regarding the issue, from believing that abortion is wrong no matter what, or that abortion should be legal all the way up to the day of birth.
For many Americans the presence of abortion in our society is a symptom of the fact that our culture is suffering from decline. It represents a failure of our people holding on to their virtuous values and principles. How can one even begin to defend the destruction of the lives of over 63 million children since the advent of Roe v. Wade, according to the Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI)?
Those who support the institution of abortion argue that it was settled law until a rogue Supreme Court decided to upend it in 2021 with the Dobbs v. Jackson decision.
Let’s begin there. Was abortion the law of the land, as the supporters of Roe v. Wade argued?
Law is something that must be established by the legislative process. Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution provides that all legislative powers belong to Congress, therefore, the Courts have no legal authority to establish law. That was the argument of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Dobbs v. Jackson ruling – the court may not establish law, and there is no delegation in the Constitution granting to the federal government any authority over the power to establish any law regarding abortion in the first place. The Enumeration Doctrine holds that only powers expressly enumerated in the Constitution are granted to the U.S. Government, and since abortion is not mentioned as a power anywhere in the Constitution, including in any amendments, the power as per the Tenth Amendment belongs to the States.
The ruling by the Supreme Court in Dobbs was accurate.
But, what about the right to privacy?
When abortion became an issue just prior to the Roe v. Wade case, the practice was generally viewed by the general public as being wrong – the murder of an unborn person. In order to even get the court system to consider overturning laws against abortion they needed to convince the judges that abortion was a constitutional right – so, they devised that it was a right to privacy.
The concept of a right to privacy stems from Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965, a case that had nothing to do with medical procedures, and instead was regarding one’s personal records. The right to be left alone by government is a long-standing American belief, and is an important component of liberty. Government is told that it has no authority to interfere with the rights of Americans in a number of the amendments in the Bill of Rights. The Court determined that based on their interpretation the Constitution implies a “zone of privacy.” The problem is, as already stated in this article, the original intent of the United States Constitution is that in order to possess a power the federal government must be expressly authorized by the Constitution to have that power. The right to privacy is nowhere in the text of the document, and it is a stretch to include abortion under the definition of the right to privacy as provided by the courts.
The right to privacy argument has elevated abortion to the same level of the freedom of speech, trial by jury, and the right to be secure in one’s person, home, papers, and effects. As far as the proponents of abortion are concerned, abortion ranks right up there with any and all other American bedrock principles. Gloria Feldt, a former president of Planned Parenthood, has proclaimed that abortion is a “guaranteed basic human right…a right as intrinsic as the right to breathe and to walk, to work and to think, to speak our truths, to thrive, to learn, and to love.” Anyone who opposes abortion, therefore, seeks to undermine and threaten the constitutional rights of women.
Edward Lazarus, a former law clerk to Justice Harry Blackmun who wrote the majority opinion regarding Roe v. Wade, wrote:
As a matter of constitutional interpretation and judicial method, Roe borders on the indefensible. I say this as someone utterly committed to the right to choose, as someone who believes such a right has grounding elsewhere in the Constitution instead of where Roe placed it, and as someone who loved Roe’s author like a grandfather. . . . .
What, exactly, is the problem with Roe? The problem, I believe, is that it has little connection to the Constitutional right it purportedly interpreted. A constitutional right to privacy broad enough to include abortion has no meaningful foundation in constitutional text, history, or precedent. …
The proof of Roe’s failings comes not from the writings of those unsympathetic to women’s rights, but from the decision itself and the friends who have tried to sustain it. Justice Blackmun’s opinion provides essentially no reasoning in support of its holding. And in the almost 30 years since Roe’s announcement, no one has produced a convincing defense of Roe on its own terms.
- Lazarus, “The Lingering Problems of Roe v. Wade,” Oct. 03, 2002, available at
https://writ.findlaw.com/lazarus/2002/1003.html.
In other words, the ruling exceeded its constitutional authority; and as Dobbs v. Jackson later determined, neither guaranteeing the right to privacy, nor abortion, is expressly enumerated in the Constitution as an authority of the federal government.
As for calling abortion a woman’s “reproductive right,” abortion is not akin to childrearing or child-production; it’s child destruction that not only kills an unborn child, but negates a man’s role in bringing children into the world, relegating him to only being the potential fertilizer of an ovum. A right to privacy might be able to be argued to cover one’s private sexual behavior that would result in producing a child, but the destruction of a child is hardly something that occurs outside of the view of others. And if one wishes to argue the point that there are occasions that abortion is necessary because of the hardships of raising unwanted children, there is a non-lethal means to resolve the same “problem.” Adoption.
Ryan T. Anderson, co-author of a book published by Regnery titled “Tearing Us Apart: How Abortion Harms Everything and Solves Nothing” explains that abortion has also been used to anchor the feminist argument about “equality.” Anderson suggests that “besides the physical, emotional, and mental harm done to women by abortion, great harm is done as a result of the worldview suggesting abortion is necessary for equality.” Abortion advocates basically argue that a normal function of a woman’s body is somehow dysfunctional, and in order for her to be equal to men she needs to kill her child.
Alexandra DeSanctis, Anderson’s co-author, said that “many seem to think abortion is empowering, and she thinks that’s fueled by this underlying assumption that freedom is just participation in sex at any point with anybody with no consequences. A man can walk away without physically bearing a child, but a woman cannot without committing a violent act against her own child.”
DeSanctis challenged those who are pro-abortion by saying, “What kind of society are we if the best solution we have to any set of problems is to kill the most vulnerable people among us? If you believe abortion is necessary, think about why, and think about: ‘Are the problems that you identify that make you think abortion is the solution really solved by perpetrating violence against innocent, vulnerable human beings?’ How are any of us really better off?”
During the recent election the proponents of legalizing abortion across America told us that most Americans support that position. A Harvard/Harris poll just a couple years ago says otherwise. According to the poll, 54% of likely voters want abortion restrictions, and only 8% support abortion at any stage of pregnancy. While I believe that this country was designed to be a republic, rather than a pure democracy, the fact is that even those who claim they are the preservers of democracy don’t have the numbers on their side as they claim.
One might argue, as has a number of pro-choice advocates in recent years, and Kamala Harris during the 2024 presidential election, that outlawing abortion places the lives of pregnant women at risk because doctors will be fearful to perform abortions when those cases arrive.
I spent four years on the board of a Pro-Life Pregnancy Center’s board of executives, and in all of my dealings with persons in the pro-life community it was understood that each pregnancy case must be dealt with individually – and typically when the mother’s life is at risk should the pregnancy continue, the baby will not survive the pregnancy anyway. Those pregnancies are ectopic pregnancies, which typically involves when an egg plants inside a fallopian tube, rather than the uterus. A full-term pregnancy, in those cases, will always ultimately kill both mother and child, so a medical procedure to terminate the pregnancy to save the mother’s life then would be acceptable. No Pro-Life Advocate has ever argued that in those cases there should be no termination of the pregnancy when it is well-understood that if the pregnancy goes full-term both mother and child will not survive. The fact that the pro-abortion lobby is untruthful about that accusation, and is content to use a situation that is actually pretty rare in the grand scheme of things, to support the argument that abortion on demand for any reason should be legal, is disingenuous at best.
The Daily Signal reported on ectopic pregnancies and the argument by pro-abortionists that pro-life laws prevent doctors from treating those kinds of pregnancies. Ectopic pregnancies are when a fertilized egg attaches outside the lining of a woman’s uterus. It is a rare occurrence, happening in less than 2% of pregnancies. Medical technology is not yet able to save the baby, so the goal has become to at least save the life of the mother. Doctors are fully away that an ectopic pregnancy termination is not an abortion, and the laws the pro-abortion lobby is screaming about recognizes that fact. An abortion is the intentional, unnatural procedure that kills the baby in the womb that would otherwise be able to progress and develop to a successful life birth if left alone. The termination of an ectopic pregnancy is a medical procedure that must be performed to save the life of the mother. The claims that women fear going to the doctor to end an ectopic pregnancy in States where anti-abortion laws are in place are simply not true. There are no laws in any State that denies a woman’s needed medical care for an ectopic pregnancy. In all States, even those with the strictest anti-abortion laws, removing an ectopic pregnancy is legal, and not considered abortion.
Regardless of which side of the aisle one might reside on, the reality is that the topic of abortion is serious business and is not something that should be taken lightly. Lives are involved. Mother’s lives, and the lives of the unborn children. Unfortunately, there are those on the pro-abortion side that might not agree with that statement. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky CEO, Betty Cockrum, said, “the mood of the abortion industry is total misery…it’s just no fun anymore. It just gets harder by the day. That’s tough.”
No fun anymore? Was Ms. Cockrum suggesting that the abortion of unborn lives is fun when it is not hindered by any opposition?
When Donald Trump first emerged on the scene in 2016, the abortion rate had fallen to the lowest level it had been since Roe v. Wade in 1973, so for pro-abortionists like Cockrum there was indeed cause for alarm, not just because it might get in the way of their fun of killing babies, but because abortion as a business needs the numbers to keep going up.
The business of abortion, we have learned, goes way pass the claim that it is all about reproductive rights. Last year the University of Pittsburgh was discovered to have been “illegally harvesting fetal tissue from aborted babies for experimentation.” Dr. Warren Hern at his clinic in Boulder, Colorado has been carrying out late stage abortions for decades. The film, “Gosnell: The Trial of America’s Biggest Serial Killer” put on the big screen the story about Kermit Barron Gosnell who provided illegal late-term abortions at his clinic in West Philadelphia. He was later convicted of the murders of three infants who were born alive after using drugs to induce labor. One woman under his care died during an abortion procedure, and he covered up the death. When his clinic was investigated the visiting detectives found the feet of aborted babies in jars, saved as trophies by Gosnell. Earlier this year a memorial service for five infants killed under the services of Gosnell was held, and members of Congress have called for transparency regarding the issue.
Why would doctors perform late-term abortions like that?
Undercover journalists working with James O’Keefe in 2015 posted a video during which a Planned Parenthood doctor admitted using partial-birth abortions to sell baby body parts. Late term abortions work best because the body parts are more developed. Rather than being exposed at the party of death, the leftist political establishment attacked James O’Keefe for exposing them for selling baby body parts, the courts turned against the whistle-blowers and sent those who exposed the sickening crimes of Planned Parenthood to jail. The whole thing was so ridiculous that even the left-wing Los Angeles Times agreed that the charges and legal attack against the undercover journalists was uncalled for, and politically motivated.
Then, there’s the harm that abortion causes that goes way beyond the killing of the baby. When I was on the board for the pro-life pregnancy center, one of the issues was that young girls were popping the Plan-B pill like tic-tacs. Not only are these girls self-sterilizing their bodies, but in many cases they would take the pills later in the pregnancy and then abort the child and be horrified upon viewing the little body with arms and legs and fingers and toes that had fallen into the toilet, or wherever else the self-induced miscarriage occurred.
According to a recent study regarding Danish medical records, there is a 50% increased risk of the need for a woman to seek out psychiatric treatment during the year following a first abortion. The elevated risk was highest (87% increased risk) for personality and behavioral disorders. The numbers regarding the mental health of a woman after an abortion far exceeded any mental health needs by a woman after a live birth. Women have become so desensitized regarding killing their babies that every once in a while we’ll see horrifying stories about babies left for dead after birth.
Elizabeth Warren has argued that pro-lifers claim they care about life before birth, but could care less after birth. That, also, is a lie. For example, the pro-life pregnancy center I worked with provided resources for young mothers who had changed their minds about abortion thanks to the work of the counselors at the center for the first couple years. Providing such services is a norm at the pro-life pregnancy resource centers around the country. These centers offer diapers and other needed products, medical testing, parenting classes, ultrasounds, maternity homes, and job training referrals – typically at no cost, or very little cost.
Ultrasounds are the biggest help in changing a woman’s mind about having an abortion. While pro-abortion advocates try to convince people that an unborn pregnancy is nothing more than a blob of tissue, or just a group of undeveloped cells, the reality is that the baby is formed rather quickly, and at 21 days the heart begins beating – a reality detectable within about six weeks of the pregnancy. When a woman receives an ultrasound, and she sees the moving child within her belly on the screen, it becomes a very powerful moment. California’s purveyors of killing unborn children realize the effectiveness of the ultrasound, and has actually worked to outlaw pro-life pregnancy centers from being allowed to provide that service.
Although the Hyde Amendment prohibits federal taxpayer funding for most abortions, federal dollars pour into Planned Parenthood every year. Pro-abortion forces in Washington D.C. are now targeting the 1976 law, calling for it to be eliminated and for there to be no limit on federal funds being used on abortions. Kamala Harris planned to try to eliminate the filibuster to make it happen should she become President of the United States, but the election of Donald Trump has stopped that from becoming a reality.
On my radio programs I have suggested that abortion is simply a new version of an old barbaric practice: Child Sacrifice. Liberty Daily earlier this year released a video that explains exactly that, titling their video “There’s nothing new under the sun: Child Sacrifice never stopped.”
Seth Gruber, a leading voice in the pro-life movement, explains quite well how it is that a baby in the womb is not simply a lump of cells. He explains the science of the development of the human being inside the womb from the moment of conception. Even at the time of conception, the person inside the mother is a distinct, living individual.
My argument has always been that like our natural rights and the rule of law, the fact that inside a woman’s uterus is a baby, not something else, is self-evident. After all, we don’t walk up to a pregnant woman and ask, “Ah, when is your fetus due to be born?” We instinctively know that it is a baby, and that is what we call it when we approach a pregnant woman.
By Douglas V. Gibbs
Every issue is a rule of law issue. That is what the federal republic was established on way back in 1787 when the U.S. Constitution was written. The word republic means The Public Thing, or The Rule of Law; what’s morally right is supposed to come before what the people democratically demand. For example, a representative is supposed to follow the rule of law before the demands of their voters – for example: if a majority of the people demanded that people with green eyes should be rounded up and exiled, a representative knowing that is against the rule of law would not follow the demand of the people because they would know that doing such a thing would be wrong. The wrongness of it would be self-evident to the representative, and they would instead follow the rule of law. English political philosopher John Locke spoke of the natural order of things, of which is divinely dispensated, from which we get our concepts of Natural Rights and the Rule of Law. Thomas Jefferson explains in the Declaration of Independence that not only are our rights endowed upon us by The Creator, and our rights are something we are to be able to pursue without government interference, but that “These truths are self-evident.” We have a moral foundation, a standard of morality by which we live by provided to us divinely – we know the truth, we know the lies. We know right and wrong. It is self-evident what the rule of law is.
That, I believe, is what it came down to on November 5, 2024 when Donald Trump was elected President (again), and did so with the popular vote along with the Electoral College, and with both Houses of Congress. Andrew Breitbart used to say that “politics is downstream from culture.” A virtuous people will vote for virtuous leaders, and a virtuous people will expect virtuous laws and virtuous moral standards in their society.
Benjamin Franklin wisely put it this way: “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.”
You get the kind of government your morality, or lack of morality, demands. And, to paraphrase Franklin a bit, when morality goes out the window and the line between right and wrong becomes blurry the government must tighten its grip to keep it all from descending into chaos.
I learned early in life that we, as human beings, need boundaries. We have a human nature that is capable of going wayward quite easily. We constantly battle with our flesh, argues biblical teachings. None of us are truly worthy. We all fall short of the glory of God. Chaos can easily disrupt the natural order of things, and so can our human nature. The natural order of things operates with boundaries. From electrons to planets, things operate with specific orbits or designed paths. When those orbits or paths are disrupted, chaos ensues. Plants grow when the conditions favor their growth. The seed needs nutrients from the soil, water, sunlight, and space to grow. If those conditions are not met, the plant will likely not grow in the manner it is supposed to. Its path will be disrupted. The rules for the growth of a healthy plant must be applied, and followed – the boundaries must be in place. One cannot substitute oil in the place of the water, and chopped up plastic and rubber in the place of the soil and expect a proper result to transpire. The plant will die. A society is no different. Once some of the things are off-kilter, usually because of the disruptive meanderings of human nature gone wild, ultimately it will affect the entire organism.
The Election in 2024 was a call to get back on track. To return to the rule of law. To inject the natural order of things, a common sense moral standard, back into our culture and American System. Everything, after all, was beginning to seem like it was in disorder. The election was a call for America to restore its foundational culture of life, family, values, and what’s right as we know it to be – to restore the rule of law to the parameters that we know it is supposed to be; truths self-evident.
Evil has gripped this country, or at least it has tightened its grip around the neck of the leadership of the Democratic Party and their allies in the media, academia, entertainment, and a few other seedy corners of the galaxy. But, darkness cannot operate well when the light is shined upon it. We recognized the dark path the Democrats have been marching down, and Americans responded. The leftwing madness was exposed, and America did not like it.
In the beginning when the spotlights began to touch the edges of their operations the Democrats tried to throw mirrors up in order to deflect the light. That is what the accusations of fascism and Hitler were all about. It was projection – deflection. They wanted to cover up how evil they are by making their opposition look more evil than them. That’s like smacking your finger with a hammer to make the pain of your big toe go away.
The purveyors of immorality realized they had to convince you that they are not the immoral ones, after all. They wanted you to believe that their madness was the actually path of the rule of law. Those who called for “life with no boundaries” needed to convince you that life with boundaries is a bad thing, and anyone who disagrees is as evil as the most evil ideology in modern history; fascism. When asked by Anderson Cooper on CNN if she believed Trump is a fascist, Kamala Harris said, “Yes, I do.” Hillary Clinton called the Madison Square Garden Rally by Trump a reenactment of a Nazi Rally in 1939. Tim Walz, Harris’s running mate, seconded that opinion. They needed to make sure Trump looked so evil that you wouldn’t notice their dance down the path toward hellish ideas, policies and concepts. They tried to destroy the man with their words, media attacks, impeachment, lawfare, and ultimately they even tried to kill him.
Ultimately the whole thing was simply designed to cover up their own inequities – to shield you from realizing what their diabolical plans truly were..
The dangerous rhetoric was nothing new when it comes to the screaming pie holes of the leftist progressive commie Democrats, but it was reaching a new crescendo. Hitler. Nazi. Fascist. Genocide. Homophobe. Islamophobe. Apartheid. Sexist. Misogynist. White Supremacist. Racist. They grabbed for any word or phrase they could to convince you that Trump and his supporters are evil, and America would come to an end as we know it if Trump took the reins as President once again. The problem is, their false accusations trivializes evil. Words like Hitler and Fascism will begin to lose the true evilness that they are. On the back end, evil is not so evil if evil of the past was just their version of Trump, right?
It’s a version of class warfare, in the end. That’s what tyrants do. They divide people into groups, find a common enemy, and then set them at war against each other and as the chaos reaches its maximum potential they then come riding in claiming that they can fix all of the problems that they actually caused. It’s Cultural Marxism. The Soviet Union, Communist China, Cuba, Venezuela, Cambodia, and pretty much every other communist or hard-core dictatorship has gone through it at some point in history. George Orwell warned us about it, using the same recipe book in his creation of the future society of Oceania. Winston Smith’s realizations, however, fell on deaf ears when it comes to those chasing after the policies of the Democrats. The party of the donkey somehow does not recognize the correlation, and in truth they see no harm in their damaging policies and ideas. Meanwhile, as the followers demand their false equity and Marxist concepts, the leadership has worked to throw shadows over their evil doings, and convince everyone that their opposition is the real enemy to fear. In this day and age, most Americans realize that we are not really a hyphenated society. We are, in the simplest way to put it, all Americans. And of the things we have in common are about our families, and our ability to financially survive. The direction of the country was headed in a wrong direction, and we knew because of our own pocketbooks, and what we were seeing with our eyes.
You know – truth self-evident.
Most people do not feel they are better off than they were four years ago. And, most Americans are not keen on the identity politics being used — the division created by political ideology and Cultural Marxism. We don’t want to be greatly divided. We want the American Dream without government poking its nose into our business. Simple as that.
We all have been in agreement that something was wrong, but we also on Election Night came to the agreement that the thing wrong with America was not Trump, nor the foundational principles of America. We know that we are drifting away from those principles, and we voted to stop the bleeding. We realized that we had exchanged our faith in constitutional principles, which have their foundation in Faith in God, and gave into the dark path of faith in politicians and government programs. The rule of law was tossed aside, uprooting the Bible as the foundation of the rule of law, and the rule of man was driven out there for a test drive. The thing is, when you embrace the rule of man, and toss aside the rule of law, it doesn’t take very long before you start dancing around a golden calf.
We realized something was seriously wrong.
Government is not our source of liberty, nor our rights. Those things are divinely dispensated. It does, after all, say in the Constitution’s Preamble, “Secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,” does it not? Blessings of Liberty. That’s a godly thing. And remember, we are endowed by our Creator with those rights – and the Constitution was ordained and established – created with the favor of God.
We are not free because government says so, and we do not have rights because government says so. We are free by virtue. We have liberty because God created us that way. The Constitution simply says that our rights belong to us, and the government has only limited authority to make laws that are necessary and authorized by the Constitution. Nothing more.
America has been prosperous and a shining beacon for the entire world because America is godly, and we have been (for the most part) recognizing and following the rule of law since our founding.
That is what this election was about. The Democrats, led this time by Kamala Harris, was telling us that God was to be denied, our natural rights are government’s to determine, and that their left-wing power is forward thinking. So, they aimed to stack the Supreme Court, stack Congress, and stack the presidency. And, they were willing to accomplish these things using everything at their fingertips, legal and illegal – be it non-citizen voting, tweaking the election, and passing laws to change our system to better fit their authoritarian desires.
This election stopped all of that … we hope.
They claimed they were trying to save the democracy. The Founding Fathers rejected democracy, and gave us a federal republic. Democracies are destructive, allowing the population centers to dominate everything, and vote away the rights of the minority populations that don’t play ball with their dreams of tyranny. The Democrats have been seeking a realignment of American Society away from the Constitution and its biblical foundation to a secular, collectivistic European-style socialist state, while fanning the flames of division between races, ethnicity, lifestyles, the sexes, and morality. They want you to believe America was founded upon racist ideals, and that America as it has been is irreversibly racist, so we don’t just need change, we need to completely do away with the old system. “We don’t want to go back,” they told us – a slogan based on the idea that the Constitution and the American System has been flawed from the beginning. In their minds, it all must be overthrown.
That’s what we stopped on Election Night. The overthrow of America. The true insurrection. The true insurgency. But what do we do now? How can we unteach the youth all of the “America is systematically racist” garbage that has been crammed into their brains?
It begins with God, and continues with education.
Keeping the Republic is a lot more laborious than saving a democracy. Keeping the Republic goes way beyond voting. And with all of the damage done, it is all hands on deck. The win on Election Day is not a call for complacency, it is a demand for doing everything we can to make sure that this country doesn’t follow the damaging leftist path again. We need to change the curricula back to foundational principles, create instructional materials that are in line with American foundational principles, and we need to flood the positions of education and politics with our Faith-grounded allies. You, my friends, may need to run for office, or get involved in the schools, or support those who are deep in the fight.
We need to combat the revolutionary agenda of leftwing insurrection and recognize that the way to do it is from the inside. We need to make sure Lawfare as it was waged against Trump simply because he was the opposition never happens again. We need to make sure that Voter ID becomes a constitutional amendment, not just law, to keep the socialists from playing the non-citizen voter game ever again. We need to shine a light on who the Democrats really are; that they are the true socialists and fascists of this age and that they operate in direct opposition to what our Constitution created. We need to shine a light on their lies and demonization of the truth – recognizing that the blurring of the lines between right and wrong is destructive. The Kamala Harris campaign lost not because of who she chose as running mate, or because men didn’t want a woman president, or because of some other racist or sexist reason. The Democrats lost because they warped their data, hold warped positions, and ignore that we are Americans – not various groups that need to be set against each other. Open borders, inflation, abortion, transgenderism, green “we’ve got to save the planet” obsessions, and all of the other racist and evil positions of the left-wing Democrats needs to be sent into the past never to resurface again.
Truth won.
Now, once Trump and the Republicans, take office, we need to make sure we get things done. Let’s stop China from buying up land in the United States. Let’s reignite the free market and send inflation packing. Let’s get away from the idea that the doctors should be drug-pushers and the free market ought not challenge the power of Obamacare or insurance companies. Let’s break up the cartel between government and the pharmaceutical industry. Let’s send the leftwing media packing by moving the public away from listening to and viewing their tripe. Let’s take action, I prefer through a constitutional amendment, to make sure election integrity shines bright and that non-citizens do not vote in any of our elections with a Voter ID amendment to the Constitution. Let’s keep the federal government out of the business of the States except when a need of resources like during a natural disaster happens – then let’s make sure agencies like FEMA operate as they were originally intended to. Let’s secure the border, reform our immigration laws to make it harder to illegally come into the country, yet make it more streamlined for those who do follow the law and wish to immigrate to this great country and be an assimilated productive member of our society. Let’s get back to our enemies around the world thinking twice about acting aggressively while simultaneously making sure those strategies do not include sending our military boots around the globe. Let’s protect places like Israel and Taiwan, and make China and Russia and the Islamic countries nervous again. Let’s do what we can to make sure Lawfare doesn’t rear its ugly head again, and ensure that all of the court cases against Trump go away. Let’s free all of those political prisoners that the Democrats had targeted – especially the January 6 people of which I fully expect Trump to pardon once in office. Let’s quit with the identity politics and move forward as Americans. Let’s end the transgender madness, take men out of women’s sports, and recognize this madness for what it is – a socially induced mental illness. Let’s unleash the free market by reducing taxes across the board, eliminate the taxes Trump has called for eliminating, work toward the day that the 16th Amendment is repealed, reduce government regulations, give back much of the governmental legislation needed for the free market back to the States, and use tariffs to bring manufacturing back to the United States. Let’s end climate extremism, recognize that the climate changes due to natural phenomenon and adjust to it rather than chase communism as the answer to “save the planet.” Let’s stop pushing to electrify everything. Let’s stop with the name-calling, the antifa and Black Lives Matter divisive antics, stop burning down our cities every time some lefty claims racism is on the rise, and stop trying to suspend our rights and the principles of the Constitution. Let’s punish criminals for committing crimes, and stand firm against our international enemies. Let’s stop being the culture of death and recognize that babies in the womb are people too and have a right not to be killed. Let’s stop trying to confuse the whole abortion argument by stopping all of the “life of the mother” arguments. In just about all cases where the mother’s life is in danger, the pregnancy is not one that will reach a healthy conclusion so terminating dangerous pregnancies is not abortion – they are medical procedures to save the life that can be saved. Let’s stand firm with Israel, and recognize that Islam in nearly all cases clings to its fundamental foundation and simply wants to spread around the world and stamp out every Jew and Christian in the process. Islam only understands a firm hand. Cease-fires and appeasement never works with Islam. Thomas Jefferson knew it, James Madison knew it, and Donald Trump knows it. Let’s not mess with the checks and balances created by the Founding Fathers, and that includes the filibuster rule. Checks and balances keeps tyranny at bay. Let’s kill every law that targets gasoline powered engines, restore incandescent lighting as a choice for consumers, stop any talk about ridiculous taxation or price controls, let’s stop trying to convince children to chemically sterilize themselves, let’s stop forcing our daughters to share locker rooms with boys who think they’re girls, let’s return education back to teaching our kids how to read – write – and do math, let’s get our preachers back to a moral stance and for them to act as community leaders who are not afraid to talk about the issues, let’s restore critical thinking, let’s create a new trustworthy media, let’s restore civil discourse, let’s eventually do away with the Federal Reserve, let’s do away with the 17th Amendment and reverse Reynolds v. Sims so we can start marching down the road of restoring the republic, let’s stop selling our military secrets to the highest bidders and/or China, let’s reignite a vibrant space program, and let’s get back to the original principles of the Constitution as they relate to liberty, the free market, and the federal government’s role in our lives.
On all of these things the Republican Party needs to unify. One of the problems during the first Trump presidency was that too many Republicans had fallen for the Democratic Party’s negative rhetoric, and even though Trump had both Houses of Congress during the first two years, he got little legislative support. Let’s not fall for that again. Let’s all work together to restore what we had, and frankly, to Make America Great Again.
— Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Support Mr. Constitution’s movement to educate America …
By Douglas V. Gibbs
After last night’s dominant win by Donald J. Trump for President of the United States, which includes winning the popular vote, much of the media is calling it a great comeback. Trump did not “come back” into the favor of America. He won in 2020. This was the great overcome, as in overcoming the cheat and proving that Donald Trump’s election as President was simply too big to rig.
Voters said no to high inflation and economic attacks against the business sector. Voters said no to heavy regulations and the government banning products. Voters said no to wokeism. Voters said no to the green agenda. Voters said no to price controls and heavier taxation against the free market. Voters said no to an open border and lawlessness. Voters said no to monkeying with the U.S. Supreme Court. Voters said no to war and anti-Israel rhetoric. Voters said no to the dangerous rhetoric. Voters said yes to future blessings, and moving forward to restore liberty for future generations. Voters said yes to making America great again not only for themselves, but for our posterity.
The “Battleground States,” as always, were the key. In the past that meant Florida and Ohio. Those are now solid GOP States. Trump’s win came by way of North Carolina, Georgia and Pennsylvania; with a strong assist by Wisconsin and Michigan. At the time of writing this piece, Trump remained ahead in Arizona and Nevada, as well.
In addition to the win, the Republican Party has gained a majority in the U.S. Senate (though Susan Collins of Maine and Murkowski in Alaska may pose a challenge so we need to land a couple more seats) currently 52-45. Republicans lead in Senate races in a couple more States and could end up with 54.
The House of Representatives looks like it will shape up to maintain a Republican majority in that legislative body, as well.
As famous democrats have said, “Elections Matter.”
Trump’s agenda, however, will not launch until Inauguration Day on January 20, 2025 — and that journey will likely include surviving last ditch efforts to stop him claiming he is not eligible because he is guilty (even though he’s not) of inciting insurrection. That said, the Democrats will be a minority on January 6 when the electoral votes are counted before a joint session of Congress, so even that effort will likely fall face first into the mud of history.
My question now, is, will there be violence?
Seattle has already experienced a share of violence.
Will the Democrats accept the election results?
Rachel Maddow is already claiming that Trump’s win was due to Russian interference.
They tried to stop the win…
In Pennsylvania “disrupters” caused chaos at a voting site.
The blame-game has already launched.
MSNBC blames Kamala’s loss and Trump’s win on “white women” and “misinformation.“
The Washington Post is “mystified” over the election results.
Oprah is convinced there will never be another election again — as Kamala Harris at the time of the writing of this piece STILL has not conceded — and refused to talk to her supporters on Election Night.
Meanwhile…
The Republican Party, remade under the skillful hand of Donald Trump, even flipped the governor’s seat in Puerto Rico to the GOP.
Donald Trump thanked God for the opportunity to continue to serve America.
Kamala was right on one thing — America was ready to turn the page.
— Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary