Political Pistachio
![]() |
For the Republic
Sunday 5:00 – 7:00 PM Pacific
Hosts: Alan Myers & Douglas V. Gibbs
There was a Mar-a-Lago attack this morning, and I disagree with the media. It was not an assassination attempt… I’ll explain tonight.
By Douglas V. Gibbs
For years, critics have warned that the economic model embraced by many Democrat‑run states will chase away the very wealth they need to fund their pipe dreams. High taxes, heavy regulation, and ideological policymaking is beginning to collide with reality. The warnings have become reality as the exodus from Blue-States is happening in real time with the evidence mounting across the country. From California to New York City to Illinois, wealth and employers are voting with their feet.
California’s outward migration has become a national case study. High‑profile companies including Chevron, Tesla, McKesson, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and Oracle have already fled the state, citing high costs and suffocating regulation. Between 2022 and 2023 alone, 700,000 residents left California, driven by affordability pressures and tax burdens. Even Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is in the process of moving from California to South Florida, reportedly purchasing a $200 million mansion on the exclusive Indian Creek Island near Miami. This move follows a trend of tech billionaires leaving California not only for leftist policies already in place, but also amidst proposals for a 5% “billionaires tax” on residents with a net worth over $1 billion. California, overall, has lost 57,000 high-net-worth individuals between 2018 and 2022, representing an estimated $1.1 trillion in personal wealth.
This is not a trickle… it is a structural hemorrhage.
New York City is now experiencing its own version of the same phenomenon. Mayor‑elect Zohran Mamdani, a self‑described democratic socialist, has proposed sweeping tax hikes on the wealthy, including raising the city’s top income tax rate from 3.9% to 5.9%. Combined with state taxes, New York would become the highest-taxed jurisdiction for top earners in the country.
Critics warn that such policies accelerate the flight of affluent residents and employers. Some analysts have already dubbed this the “Mamdani Effect,” warning that the city’s tax base could erode just as its spending ambitions expand.
If losing residents and businesses wasn’t enough, Illinois now faces a symbolic blow: the potential departure of the Chicago Bears football team, one of the NFL’s most storied franchises.
Indiana lawmakers have advanced legislation to lure the team to Hammond, Indiana, with the Bears committing $2 billion toward a new stadium project. The move has triggered a political firestorm in Illinois.
Former Governor Rod Blagojevich blasted Governor JB Pritzker for “gubernatorial malpractice,” arguing that Illinois’ high taxes and anti‑business climate are driving away even its most iconic institutions.
Other Illinois political figures echoed the criticism, pointing to Indiana’s aggressive, pro‑business strategy which stands as a stark contrast to Illinois’ regulatory and high tax environment. Some local officials were accused of being “asleep at the wheel” as Indiana outmaneuvered them.
The potential move of the Chicago Bears follows departures of the San Francisco 49ers to Santa Clara in 2014, and the Oakland Raiders to Las Vegas in 2020. While in both of those circumstances the official reasons cited are stadium issues, the reality in both cases is that the blue cities who once had those teams could not afford to keep them due to leftist policies that have both San Francisco and Oakland in real financial trouble. San Francisco is currently facing a major budget crisis with a deficit of $817.5 million with a projected deficit of nearly $1.2 billion by 2029. Oakland is struggling with a structural budget deficit, thought on a smaller scale than its neighbor across the bay. Oakland is facing a $200 million deficit over the next two fiscal years with it getting worse as each year passes. Both cities are run by hard-left Democrat regimes.
The symbolism is powerful: when football teams, a civic institution intertwined with a city’s identity, exits it signals deeper structural problems.
Across blue cities and states, the pattern is unmistakable:
- High taxes push out high earners.
- Heavy regulation pushes out employers.
- Ideological policymaking pushes out investment.
- Affordability crises push out working families.
Meanwhile, low‑tax, business‑friendly states and regions, especially in the South and Mountain West, are absorbing the outflow of capital, talent, and opportunity.
This is not merely a partisan talking point. It is a measurable demographic and economic shift reshaping the American landscape.
As more wealth and employers leave blue states and deep-blue cities, the remaining tax base shrinks. Yet the political leadership in these states and cities often respond not by reforming policy, but by doubling down on the very approaches that triggered the exodus.
The result is a feedback loop:
- Higher taxes → more out‑migration
- More out‑migration → shrinking revenue
- Shrinking revenue → calls for even higher taxes
California, New York, and Illinois are now deep into this cycle.
The departure of residents can be dismissed. The departure of businesses can be rationalized. But the departure of the Chicago Bears, a cultural institution, should serve as a wake‑up call that even the most loyal fixtures of blue‑state life are no longer willing to endure the economic environment created by progressive governance.
— Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
By Douglas V. Gibbs
The money is gone, and the thieves have gone to the bank with government’s blessing. The Feeding Our Future scandal in Minnesota stole at least $250 million from programs allegedly designed to feed children, and federal investigators indicate the total fraud may be in the billions.
While we are beginning to find out who the fraudsters are, what is more alarming is who the enablers are. The foundation for all of this fraud was provided during the Obama regime, during which time the federal government imported more than 54,000 Somali refugees in the name of a very huge loving heart, concentrating a very large portion of them Minnesota. By the time Obama’s gambit reached its zenith, Minnesota had been overrun with the largest Somali population across the United States.
On the surface our hearts were supposed to go out to these folks. Asylum seekers who only wanted a better life. To think otherwise would be racist. Obama and the Democrats of the time knew that the whole thing would either tug on your heart-strings, or silence you with fears of being called a racist. It was all a part of the plan. Create a massive community that is so dependent upon government programs that the government claims for benefits for the underserved would go through the roof. Dependency by groups who claim to be down-trodden and government coming to the rescue looks good on a collectivist resume, the Democrats believe, so they loaded the plate as high as they could.
The Obama administration promoted the policies in the name of caring, feelings, and equity. In fact, in the name of helping out the poor Somali community they even relaxed oversight for minority‑run organizations – you know… because to do otherwise would look – – – racist.
The result? No questioning of any suspicious activity. Bureaucrats lived in fear, because to question any of it would be racist and discriminatory. They feared looking bad or being called a racist much more than stopping any situation emerging that might be wasting taxpayer money or defrauding the federal government.
So, fraudulent claims kept being paid for even when the numbers didn’t quite add up. And then, if anyone said anything? If any officials considered trying to stop the payments? The fraudsters knew how to play the game, suing the state for discrimination. The result? The officials inside the state government balled up into a fetal position, hiding behind their titles, quivering under their desks, and backing down as the fraud grew and grew and grew.
Oversight died. Any American-style system of checks and balances was swept into a closet or pushed under the rug. Nobody wanted to be called a racist, after all – and the Somali Community had learned how to wield that weapon well.
Enter stage left, Ilhan Omar – the Somali member of Congress from the district where the fraud was centered.
She supported the programs, demanded the benefits, and winked with a smile as the rule-makers removed key verification rules from federal food programs. Parents no longer had to bring children to meal sites, and in‑person checks were eliminated when it came to the 2020 Meals Act.
Fraud became easier, and more opportunists jumped on the bandwagon. There were, after all, billions of dollars to be made – and the explosion of fraud rang loudly, with some individuals knowing exactly who was buttering their toast, so they donated to Omar’s campaign. She said nothing, and returned not a single dollar until the screws tightened and the media began asking questions.
Enter Donald J. Trump, and his investigators who noticed what was going on, and began to dig into the whole mess. They began to find connections that had been hidden, connections that linked the fraudsters and their massive network to people getting wealthy inside the Democratic Party.
Ilhan Omar’s wealth wasn’t only through her own adventures, however. Her hubby was raking in the bucks through his venture capital firm called Rose Lake Capital, which listed advisors who previously served as ambassadors and officials in the Obama administration.
“Hmmm,” thought critics and investigators: Why would all of these high‑level political figures be connected, even indirectly, to a region and community of Somalis experiencing the largest fraud case in U.S. history?
The game was not restricted to only Minnesota, either. Not only did it bleed into other states, and God-knows what other kind of fraud by Democrats and their allies have been orchestrated across America, but the money was also crossing the border to international locations. The stolen money was being used to buy property overseas in places that created even more interesting connections: Kenya, Turkey, and other countries.
One wonders if any of those monies got into the hands of terrorist organizations, or other radical anti-American groups seeking our downfall. Think about it… it is very likely that American taxpayer dollars are being used to fund our enemies because of the fraud fueled by Democrat policies that purposely exist with as little oversight as possible.
And we know how the “scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours” game goes. The Democratic Party officials allowing all of this to happen and keeping their mouths shut made the Somali Community in Minnesota filthy rich with American tax dollars, so the Somali population returned the favor, voting overwhelmingly for Democrats.
Easy-peasy… import a population well known for dependency on government (85% of the Somali population is on some kind of federal benefits), wink and nod because on its face it looks like a poor underserved community is being looked out for, channel billions of federal taxpayer dollars through fraudulent non-profit organizations, weaken oversight, attack anyone who questions the operation as racist to silence them, rinse, repeat.
This strategy worked because ordinary citizens were afraid to speak up, and the officials were either also afraid, or in on it.
Now, as the Trump administration investigates, the knives are out. As the audit advances, and the theft is being identified and attempted to be recovered, the cries of racism have become deafening. All of it as a result of Obama’s Somali resettlement system in the name of asylum. No accountability. No oversight. Lots of money to be made by anyone who wants to join in.
Never mind political agendas – this stuff makes the mafia and the mob look tame. It’s a designed system of fraud. Everyone knew it. And, they played the game willingly by removing oversight, and they got away with it because they have trained an entire generation of Americans to believe in socialist “equity” and that America is systemically racist. The government, they have pounded into the heads of their flock, is there to save you and those poor refugees. And the snowflakes and the progressive radicals cried crocodile tears as everyone else hid for fear of being canceled as a racist should they say something.
Now, Trump is demanding that the fraud be exposed, and that honesty, accountability, and a government that protects taxpayer money gets to the bottom of it, and the Democrats cry foul as the media provides cover. After all, they’ve been making millions and they don’t want the money train to stop and they truly believe they are bullet proof and will pay no consequences.
I am still waiting for the handcuffs and orange jumpsuits to fly off the racks. We’ve been waiting a long time. The hammer has to fall eventually… right?
— Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
| Mr. Constitution Hour KCBQ 1170 AM/96.1 FM at 8 pm and KPRZ 1210 AM/106.1 FM, Saturday at 8 pm (All Times Pacific) |
![]() Mr. Constitution Hour airs every Saturday Night at 8pm Pacific Time. 8:00 PM: KCBQ The Answer San Diego (https://theanswersandiego.com/) and KPRZ K-Praise (www.kprz.com) Mr. Constitution Hour on KPRZ and KCBQ is a radio broadcast that looks at The United States Constitution through the lens of Christianity. The program is hosted by Mr. Constitution Douglas V. Gibbs. This Week: Mr. Constitution Hour by Douglas V. Gibbs: Mr Constitution tackles the FED, ICE, Sewage Spills, Peace, AOC and Colbert – Kevin Warsh has been nominated by President Trump for the Federal Reserve chair – is Warsh a good choice? Democrats are demanding that Judicial Warrants accompany ICE operations – how could judicial warrants interfere with ICE’s mission? The Potomac Sewage Spill now has states and the federal government in a squabble over jurisdiction, and Trump telling the states to ask nicely if they want his help. President Trump’s Board of Peace held its first meeting. AOC stumbled with her responses in Munich: what would she have said if she were to be honest? And, Colbert defied both CBS and the FCC. Should he have? Catch past episodes at Salem San Diego’s podcast page set up for Doug at https://omny.fm/shows/douglas-v-gibbs/playlists/mr-constitution-hour-by-douglas-v-gibbs And on the following podcast platforms: I-Heart Radio Spotify Audacy Apple Tune-In Audible Amazon ListenNotes Rephonic Podchaser Ivoox And ranked among top ten best constitutional podcasts by FeedSpot. Become a Patron to Help Support the Movement |
![]() |
| ALERT:Be a sponsor or advertiser (contact me at constitutionspeaker@yahoo.com to discuss terms) Donate (https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/douglasvgibbs) Become a $9 per month Patron Member at my website (https://www.douglasvgibbs.com/membership-account/membership-levels/) Purchase my books! Scroll down to the list and all of the links at www.navigation2liberty.com Saturday Radio with Douglas V. Gibbs “Mr. Constitution” Constitution Radio: With Doug, Alan and Dennis – KMET 1490 AM, Saturday 1:00 pm – 3:00 pm Pacific http://www.kmet1490am.com |
![]() ![]() |







Armed Intruder Shot and Killed After Breaching Mar‑a‑Lago Perimeter in Early‑Morning Attack
By Douglas V. Gibbs
In the early morning hours of February 22, 2026, an armed intruder in his early twenties was shot and killed after breaching the secure perimeter of Mar‑a‑Lago, the private residence of President Donald Trump, in Palm Beach, Florida. According to multiple law‑enforcement briefings, the suspect carried a shotgun and a fuel can, and advanced far enough into the property to reach the interior grounds before being confronted by U.S. Secret Service agents and a Palm Beach County Sheriff’s deputy.
The confrontation occurred at approximately 1:30 a.m., when the suspect, described as a young male from North Carolina who had recently been reported missing by his family, entered the property as another vehicle was exiting. Agents observed him near the north gate, carrying the shotgun and fuel can. When law enforcement challenged him, the suspect dropped the fuel can, assumed a shooter’s stance, and raised the shotgun toward officers. He was immediately shot and pronounced dead at the scene.
President Trump was not at Mar‑a‑Lago during the attack. He was attending a governors’ dinner in Washington, D.C., and the First Lady was also away from the residence.
This incident marks the third known assassination attempt against President Trump while in office; an unprecedented moment in American history. While the investigation is ongoing and officials have not yet released a motive or any details, the presence of a fuel can alongside a long gun raises serious questions about the intruder’s intentions.
A common shotgun is not a weapon that would likely accomplish an assassination. The suspect may have known that the President was not home and may have intended to destroy the residence by fire – a suspicion I have due to the presence of the fuel can. Authorities have not confirmed nor even entertained this interpretation, but the combination of a firearm and accelerant strongly suggests a plan involving both lethal force and property destruction.
What We Know About the Suspect So Far
No name has been released as of this writing.
The U.S. Secret Service, Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office, and the FBI are jointly investigating the incident. Officials have emphasized that they will not speculate on motive until more evidence is gathered. Early statements confirm:
A full forensic analysis of the suspect’s vehicle, digital devices, and travel history is underway.
The attack underscores a disturbing escalation in politically motivated violence. For the first time in American history, a sitting President has now been targeted three separate times by would‑be assassins. Each incident has occurred against the backdrop of increasingly hostile rhetoric, radicalization, and the normalization of political extremism.
While officials have not yet identified the suspect’s ideological leanings, the pattern of recent threats against President Trump has overwhelmingly originated from individuals influenced by radical left‑wing narratives, online extremism, or anti‑Trump political hostility. Whether this case fits that pattern remains to be confirmed, but the circumstances (armed intrusion, accelerant, nighttime approach) suggest a deliberate and potentially symbolic act.
This morning’s attack raises several urgent national‑security questions:
Until investigators release more information, these remain open but critical questions.
What is clear is this: an armed intruder with a shotgun and a fuel can penetrated the secure perimeter of the sitting President’s home, advanced into the property, and assumed a firing position before being neutralized. The rapid response of the Secret Service and local deputies prevented what could have been a catastrophic attack, whether aimed at the President himself or at destroying his residence in an act of political vengeance.
As more details emerge, this story will likely grow in scope and significance. For now, the United States is left confronting the reality that political violence has reached a level unseen in modern American history.
— Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary