By Douglas V. Gibbs
Fraud in American elections is rampant, and if we are ever able to achieve full election integrity with the passage of laws like the SAVE America Act and tightening down on mail-in voting (keeping it restricted to absentee ballots) the Democratic Party might begin to suffer a loss of electoral victories in a manner similar to the Federalist Party after 1800. The truth is, most Americans reject their radical agenda, and the only way they have been pulling off as many victories as they have has been through voter fraud and illegal alien voting.
One of the key instances of election fraud happened during the 2020 Presidential Election. I believe that election was won by Trump. But, irregularities, shenanigans, and straight out fraud twisted it in Biden’s favor. The narrow wins by Biden in Swing States, the ballot box stuffing, and the fact that he got more votes than any presidential candidate in history up to then, and since, all stink of corruption.
Dr. Douglas Frank performed a deep analysis regarding the election, and I agree with his findings. In a nutshell, his findings reveal “that just isn’t normal.” All fifty states possess markers for election fraud at some level.
I also agree with Mike Lindell’s evidence, as well. I spent a good share of time talking to Tina Peters before she was jailed for daring to reveal and share evidence of election fraud in Colorado.
But, if you dare say the things I am saying, you are a pariah. The 2020 Election seems like it’s a sacred cow that nobody wants to even touch. To say anything about it other than it was the most safe and secure election in history makes you, in their eyes, a conspiracy theorist and insurrectionist. The subject is so taboo to the mainstream media and anyone who is holding hands with the political establishment that they were willing to stage their own Reichstag Fire type of event, ruining the lives of patriotic Americans in the process. The stage was set at The Capitol on January 6, 2021. It was a trap to ensnare MAGA supporters, agitating them into a reactionary state with planted government personnel, Antifa, and a lot of loud and fiery mechanisms along with deceptive optics and a cherry picking of the video. The Hollywood Production was presented as the worse attack against America since Pearl Harbor. According to the Democrats and their partners in the media it was the worst insurrection-type action in America since the secession of the Southern States in the 1860s. Democratic politicians claimed to be hiding and crying and fearing for their lives as a bunch of elderly MAGA supporters walked between ropes like they were on a tourism visit. The cameras were snapping and videoing when some of them got angry because flash bangs were exploding in their faces and members of the Capitol Police were egging them on. Agitation spelled reaction, and the reaction was filmed as insurrection even though those who began the whole confrontation arrived long before the folks that had heard Trump speak. Trump supporters from the Ellipse wondered what was going on as they arrived as the initial agitators were breaking windows before the crowd had even arrived.
Now, Maria Bartiromo seems to have crossed the line regarding her consideration of reporting of election interference. She wanted to discuss the evidence that Trump was touting in his speech on the air, but she was told not to pursue any story tying China to 2020 election fraud. The warning by FOX News against her pursuit of the story was sent by text, among other things. She was told a story about China’s influence in 2020 was off limits. She took a screenshot of the warning, and shared it with the White House to show that the media, even FOX News, was giving into the fear being perpetuated by China. In response, FOX News fired her.
The news that Maria Bartiromo was fired by FOX News began to circulate after she vanished from the being on the air after August 9, 2026. The trigger was President Trump’s July 16 primetime address, where he revealed that China carried out the largest compromise of American election data in history. Reports indicate that FOX executives had instructed staff not to cover claims made by President Trump during the July address about election interference, particularly regarding China’s role.
When Bartiromo shared internal FOX communications with the White House, essentially “betraying” her employer by exposing network directives to suppress certain stories, on the surface one might understand why they fired her. As an employee of any company, you are not supposed to share internal communications with the outside world. In this case, however, we are talking about a network essentially colluding with the Chinese Communist Party by seeking to suppress the truth. She believed she was doing the right thing for the country, the law, and as an honest journalist when she took a screenshot of a text message from a FOX Business executive telling producers to kill a story about China and the 2020 election, and sent it to senior White House officials.
This incident occurred against the backdrop of FOX’s possible sensitivity to election-related coverage due to significant lawsuits from Dominion Voting Systems (which FOX settled for $787.5 million in 2023) and Smartmatic. The network, we have been told, was likely being particularly cautious about content that they figured might further expose them to legal liability regarding election claims. Except, this wasn’t a report by some candidate seeking office, or information released by sources that may or may not be considered legitimate. This was information provided by the federal government, and discussed by the President of the United States. Fear was not a factor. This is a clear case of colluding with the rest of mainstream media, and the Chinese Communist Party.
The firing of Bartiromo demonstrates the willingness of the media, even FOX News, to still refuse to seek the truth about election integrity issues. To me, it seems like a clear case of a suppression of information that could support claims about election irregularities, which in my mind makes me wonder if the media’s role as an accomplice is more sinister than we’ve been led to believe.
— Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
